Topic: | Re:Fascist, Cameron, to introduce new government spying laws | |
Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
Date/Time: | 22/10/15 20:42:00 |
I thought the tory boys might struggle with this thread and, indeed, they have. Gintrough was even hoping it would disappear without a reply. Hardly surprising as this is about the 3rd time he’s been checkmated in as many weeks. Gintrough, you contribute nothing of interest to discuss anyway, and you must be the biggest idiot on here, so best that you disappear. Go away, go on – shoo..! Sam, whether the term ‘fascist’ is an insult or not when describing someone is subjective. The laws that Cameron is looking to put in place, combined with other language he’s used of late, suggests to me that he is planning to take us into a period of fascism and, if this proves to be the case, presumably he will be a proud fascist. I have researched the events of 9/11 and 7/7 quite extensively and found the official stories in respect of both events to be full of lies and anomalies, and so have many other people, particularly with 9/11 where many experts have disproven aspects of the official story particular to their field of expertise; yet Cameron says he’s bringing in a law to forbid anyone questioning government narratives of such events, and he specifically refers to 9/11 and 7/7. He calls these people ‘conspiracy theorists’ and holds them partly responsible for people joining ISIS..! This is, of course, complete rubbish – a lie to cover-up the real reason for wanting to silence such voices; and would he really bother with all this just to shut the odd ‘loon’ up? Of course not; but back to my point about fascism: If Cameron, the man who marched in Paris earlier this year after the Charlie Hebdo ‘attack’, in support of ‘freedom of speech’, introduces such a law and uses its powers to incriminate those that question events such as 9/11 and 7/7, and shut down websites that provide alternative narratives, would this not be a fascist act? If not, why not, and how should we describe it? The law that Cameron is now looking to bring in where the government can hack into peoples computers and phones is also extreme in my opinion. The government will argue that it’s for national security and to help protect us from terrorism; but the results of all the research I’ve carried out, at least in respect of alleged Islamic terrorism, has usually shown that governments were most likely responsible in order to blame Islamists; but let’s assume I’m wrong about this - take away 7/7 and Woolwich, and what's left? We DO NOT have a level of terrorism in this country to justify the measures that Cameron looks set to introduce, and I do not believe that the reason he gives is the real reason for their introduction. He’s already said he’s clamping down on ‘conspiracy theorists’. Why would he do this? Because they are the real threat, that’s why. This latest spying law has nothing to do with terrorism other than to control/silence those who provide evidence that raises doubt about government involvement in terrorism; but again, let’s assume I’m wrong and answer me this: If the government starts hacking into computers and phones of known ‘conspiracy theorists’, would you consider this to be a fascist act? And would you support this behaviour? If so, why? If not, why not? In any event, if this is not fascism, what term would best describe this behaviour? Of course, the trouble that some very decent people may find themselves in as a result of Cameron’s disclosed plans may be eased for them under The Human Rights Act, but he says he wants to abolish that too. If we join the dots together, we see a very bleak picture emerging, and it's a picture of what all this is really about; and it’s not just this country. It seems that all of the Western countries involved in the raping and pillaging of the Middle East are collaborating and using the fake war on terror to introduce Orwellian controls over their own people. France, who have hosted one false flag after another of late, are also introducing laws to shut people up about what they’re doing. And then, of course, there’s the U.S. government, a big player in all this skulduggery. People often ask me on here how all these different alleged terrorist events and hoaxes are linked. Well the US has hosted a number of mass shooting hoaxes; and it’s all about gun control. So how does that fit in with everything I’ve said above? Well if Cameron goes after all those who don’t comply with his declared authoritarian plans, think of the concerns of the authorities if we all had shooters. |