Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson
Posted by: Susan Kelly
Date/Time: 01/10/15 21:26:00

Lawson's article in The Times this morning, explaining why he was leading a 'No' campaign, was perfectly lucid and reasoned.

I expect I shall vote to stay in, on a devil-you-know basis, but it isn't a no-brainer.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Nigel Lawson01/10/15 20:13:00 R Atterwill
   Re:Nigel Lawson01/10/15 20:20:00 Paul Wright
      Re:Re:Nigel Lawson01/10/15 20:32:00 Claire Moran
         Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson01/10/15 20:51:00 Colin Jordan
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson01/10/15 21:26:00 Susan Kelly
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 10:18:00 Jonathan Bingham
   Re:Nigel Lawson01/10/15 21:40:00 R Atterwill
      Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 09:24:00 Richard Greenhough
         Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 09:43:00 R Atterwill
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 10:20:00 Richard Greenhough
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 15:50:00 Vanessa Smith
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 16:01:00 Richard Greenhough
   Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 15:58:00 Denis Fox
      Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 17:06:00 Alan Clark
         Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 18:39:00 Richard Greenhough
      Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 17:08:00 Carl Wynne
         Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 17:12:00 R Atterwill
         Re:Re:Re:Nigel Lawson02/10/15 17:34:00 R Atterwill
   Re:Nigel Lawson03/10/15 06:58:00 R Atterwill

Forum Home