Topic: | Re - what should this forum be for? | |
Posted by: | Stuart Kerr | |
Date/Time: | 22/06/15 10:22:00 |
Yup – Bob said just about all there is to say, earlier in the thread at 20/06/15 18:18:00 Beyond that, what's all the fuss about? I'm sure Bob would agree with me – that we accept our share of responsibility (along with many others) - for taking the unmerciful and gleeful pee out of Claire Moran & Loraine Pemberton. Apologies that we can only do it occasionally and far less than the dear ladies deserve - but hey life's too short. And that's the limit of our 'controversial' contribution to this place, so I can't imagine who on earth is terrifying the wits out of these few women... Regarding the Acton based OP. Please Sarah, try not to “SHOUT” so loud next time you visit Chiswick W4.com. Folk round this way can read our forum loud and clear - without resorting to CAPITAL letters in our headlines. Re Nigel Brooks. I gather he committed forum “hara-kiri” via the 'f' word and then reinvented himself under a new name. What a sad tale – and a waste of human life. Re Maisie – where's she gone? Re so-called Forum “debates”. Surely what this place needs is far more controversy not less. What's the point of debating anything with sod-obvious answers and where everyone is in agreement and every comment starts with the word “lovely”? Dog-muzzling starring the Doris Sisters was a decent debate.. Re Tim – A pity you missed the censorship debate years ago. You'd have loved life in Pigeon Farm.. Finally - Re your long-suffering constipation problem me dear. Why not try something far stronger. May I suggest One Shot Drain Clear.. :) |