Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:definition of a doris.... | |
Posted by: | Loraine Pemberton | |
Date/Time: | 19/06/15 14:41:00 |
So the Tenant's solicitor is going to protect the Sub Tenant's interests - really? I've no idea what your occupation is, but if you were taking a Sub Lease on a house / flat would you use the Tenant's solicitor? As it is thousands of £'s of remedial work is being done as I type for the Franchisee to comply with the Abatement Notices, which the Franchisee has to pay for. If they had used their own conveyancing solicitor they probably would have been advised to take expert advice on whether the property was suited to their required use and what works were required. In June last year I had a meeting pre PC of fit out with both Franchisee (Sub Tenant) and Subway (Tenant) to discuss problems that I was certain would arise, I was told by Subway's surveyor - didn't know what I was talking about! However exactly one year later and a year of both severe noise and odour pollution the poor Franchisee is paying the price. Subway are relying on the FRI Lease that sub Tenant is responsible, which legally they are. However, I do feel sorry for the Franchisee as they had no-one protecting their interests. But hey what do I know I've only been dealing in Commercial Property for nearly 2 decades. |