| Topic: | Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | |
| Posted by: | Nigel Brooks | |
| Date/Time: | 14/04/15 09:32:00 |
| They were erected without the requisite permissions, this has been done to death. The homeowner appealed and lost. The aesthetics have little to do with it save that this is a conservation area and any sensible person would have had all of the 'ticks in boxes' and 'little bits of paper' before starting work. They chose to skip this part of the process in order to get a better financial return, a decision that has unravelled. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 02:44:00 | Aila Cinar |
| Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 09:32:00 | Nigel Brooks |
| Re:Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 09:42:00 | Loraine Pemberton |
| Re:Re:Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 10:24:00 | Nigel Brooks |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 10:32:00 | Sam Hearn |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 15:06:00 | Adam Beamish |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 15:15:00 | Michael Robinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 15:24:00 | Adrian Irving |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:solar panels battle near Fuller's brewery | 14/04/15 15:20:00 | Loraine Pemberton |