Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Survey: your thoughts about this please. | |
Posted by: | Alastair Banton | |
Date/Time: | 14/02/15 15:32:00 |
It's obvious what the writer means, but 1.6% is much less than half of 4.3% so describing such a difference as 2.7% is misleading at best. According to my calculator a reduction of just 2.7% of 4.3% would yield 4.1839% - but, hey, I'm not a mathematician either. |