| Topic: | Can we trust Jim Fetzer? | |
| Posted by: | John Whitworth | |
| Date/Time: | 15/01/15 17:51:00 |
| I find it interesting that the "very credible source" of this revelation is Jim Fetzer. What does he think about Judy Wood: "... Judy Wood and her groupies appear to have the characteristics distinctive of a cult." "Here we have another display of the characteristics of a cult. As I use the word 'cult', it refers to a group (formal or informal) typified by (a) core dogmas, (b) mystic leaders, (c) intolerance of criticism, (d) disposition to attack those who question the faith, and (e) devotion to the group even when confronted with well-founded criticism. Examples that come to mind include the Branch Davidians (David Koresh) and, even more appropriately, Scientology (L. Ron Hubbard), with its pretensions toward science." He also invites comparison with Jonestown (Jim Jones). "The suggestion that Judy and her groupies possess the properties of a pseudo-scientific cult was not terribly well received... [] ...it is actually extraordinarily revealing for the insight it affords into a perverted mind..." "There also appears to be a growing consensus that the 'science' behind her claims is dubious." "... the WTC didn't just magically turn into dust." "Really all one needs to do is watch some videos of the WTC buildings exploding and that is the end of Judy Wood and her DEWs NON-theory." The following are things which "would not surprise" him: - Judy Wood's book was written by the CIA. - Judy Wood and her crew are an intelligence operation. - John Hutchison has DOE connections. There is no scientific merit to anything he's done but he works for the DOE in some capacity. Most likely as an operative. And it goes on and on. It's a real shame because they used to be such great friends... So, should we believe Jim Fetzer, or could he be a liar or an idiot? Tough call. Life is interesting in the crazy world of conspiracy! |