Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed
Posted by: Robert Fish
Date/Time: 08/12/14 14:50:00

If Dewani didn't murder his wife (and the prosecution case was pretty pathetic) then the suggestion that he was nevertheless guilty is indeed libellous. Incidentally it could never be slanderous, as that term is reserved for oral defamation.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 12:37:00 James Robinson
   Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 12:41:00 Ann Williams
      Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 13:09:00 John Connelly
         Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 14:37:00 Julian Pavey
   Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 13:19:00 Janine Jarvis
      Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 13:25:00 Janet Norman
   Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 13:20:00 Janet Norman
      Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 13:36:00 Huw Burford-Taylor
         Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 14:25:00 Susan Kelly
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 14:56:00 Aubrey Crawley
      Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 14:38:00 Brian Coyle
         Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 14:50:00 Robert Fish
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 15:10:00 Peter Millman
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 15:31:00 Brian Coyle
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 16:02:00 Huw Burford-Taylor
         Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 15:25:00 Huw Burford-Taylor
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 16:13:00 Julian Pavey
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 16:58:00 John Connelly
         Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 17:00:00 Claire Moran
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Shrien Dewani case dismissed08/12/14 17:09:00 Susan Kelly

Forum Home