Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval
Posted by: Paul Pryce
Date/Time: 16/09/14 12:43:00

The 35m depth that the link suggests is a long way down so I can't see it causing any subsidence issues. Didn't know there was a layer of sand under the clay though - presumed you'd hit rock at that depth.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Thames Tunnel Gets Approval12/09/14 18:46:00 Andrew OSullivan
   Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval12/09/14 18:56:00 Claire Moran
      Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval12/09/14 19:17:00 Kevin Howard
   Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval12/09/14 19:46:00 Peter Millman
      Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval12/09/14 20:18:00 Tessa Russell
         Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval12/09/14 23:54:00 Tim Henderson
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval13/09/14 09:17:00 Richard Greenhough
   Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval12/09/14 22:32:00 Peter Millman
      Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval13/09/14 07:31:00 Andrew OSullivan
         Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval13/09/14 13:30:00 Paul Allen
         Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel  - paying the bill.13/09/14 13:32:00 Vanessa Smith
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel  - paying the bill.13/09/14 13:43:00 Guy Lambert
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel  - paying the bill.14/09/14 21:29:00 Jeffrey Forrest
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel  - paying the bill.14/09/14 21:48:00 Jonathan Bingham
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel  - paying the bill.15/09/14 21:01:00 Karen Foster
   Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval15/09/14 18:47:00 Julian Bryson
      Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval16/09/14 12:43:00 Paul Pryce
         Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval17/09/14 09:21:00 Kevin Howard
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Thames Tunnel Gets Approval18/09/14 08:23:00 Paul Pryce

Forum Home