| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | |
| Posted by: | Julian Pavey | |
| Date/Time: | 20/08/14 21:16:00 |
Don't take this the wrong way but why 55. Seems a strange age to put other than say over 65s. Im sure some just past 50 may be interested. Just curious as to why that age range was chosen |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Lettuce be Happy! | 20/08/14 16:25:00 | Daniela Cabral |
| Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 20/08/14 18:59:00 | Micki Hawkes |
| Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 20/08/14 21:09:00 | Claire Moran |
| Re:Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 20/08/14 21:16:00 | Julian Pavey |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 20/08/14 22:17:00 | Susan Kelly |
| Re:Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 20/08/14 22:26:00 | Lynne Bruce |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 20/08/14 22:40:00 | bobby osborne |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 21/08/14 14:14:00 | Jim Lawes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Lettuce be Happy! | 21/08/14 15:02:00 | Pete Mayes |